<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#039;s New in Photoshop CS5 Part 4: Camera Raw Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2010/05/whats-new-in-photoshop-cs5-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2010/05/whats-new-in-photoshop-cs5-part-4/</link>
	<description>Use Photoshop, Your Camera, and Your Heart To Create Inspiring Images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 19:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2010/05/whats-new-in-photoshop-cs5-part-4/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.msjphotography.com/?p=2822#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>My experience with the 2010 process vs the 2003 is that 2010 actually makes my images more grainy, not less.  It was hard to see your the example in your tute, but it looked like 2010 added noise to that image as well.  My assumption is that what I am seeing is the effect of a stronger application of sharpening.

I&#039;d appreciate your thoughts on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience with the 2010 process vs the 2003 is that 2010 actually makes my images more grainy, not less.  It was hard to see your the example in your tute, but it looked like 2010 added noise to that image as well.  My assumption is that what I am seeing is the effect of a stronger application of sharpening.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d appreciate your thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

