<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Photoshop Workbench 148: Digitally Framing Your Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/</link>
	<description>Use Photoshop, Your Camera, and Your Heart To Create Inspiring Images</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:01:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sergey</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.msjphotography.com/?p=1044#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark,

Excellent workbench, thanks! I have one comment about using this technique for web-publishing or printing of digitally framed images: since the original image is scaled down, we lose some resolution that could be benefitial for printing, and, due to the necessary interpolation, some sharpness may also be lost and artifacts appear. I know it&#039;s not as bad as it sounds, but why do it if we can avoid it? My technique is to create the solid color backgound layer (&quot;the wall&quot;), and then enlarge the canvas, instead of scaling down the image. The visible result is the same, but the original image stays intact. An additional benefit is that we have a better control of what the final dimensions will be, which can be important if the picture is going to be printed.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Excellent workbench, thanks! I have one comment about using this technique for web-publishing or printing of digitally framed images: since the original image is scaled down, we lose some resolution that could be benefitial for printing, and, due to the necessary interpolation, some sharpness may also be lost and artifacts appear. I know it&#8217;s not as bad as it sounds, but why do it if we can avoid it? My technique is to create the solid color backgound layer (&#8220;the wall&#8221;), and then enlarge the canvas, instead of scaling down the image. The visible result is the same, but the original image stays intact. An additional benefit is that we have a better control of what the final dimensions will be, which can be important if the picture is going to be printed.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.msjphotography.com/?p=1044#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I would also like to download in iTunes to view later. Also would like to view the archived files since I just found this wonderful site with great teaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to download in iTunes to view later. Also would like to view the archived files since I just found this wonderful site with great teaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.msjphotography.com/?p=1044#comment-25</guid>
		<description>On a PC with Firefox it&#039;s... right click ... Save Link as...and you should have a .mov file which you can view with quicktime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a PC with Firefox it&#8217;s&#8230; right click &#8230; Save Link as&#8230;and you should have a .mov file which you can view with quicktime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Karney</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Karney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.msjphotography.com/?p=1044#comment-24</guid>
		<description>How can I download this content to view it later on my computer?  Help anyone?  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I download this content to view it later on my computer?  Help anyone?  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.msjphotography.com/index.php/2008/10/photoshop-workbench-148-digitally-framing-your-work/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.msjphotography.com/?p=1044#comment-23</guid>
		<description>One additional comment, if you make the image layer a smart object, then it is possible to change out the image by replacing the smart object contents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One additional comment, if you make the image layer a smart object, then it is possible to change out the image by replacing the smart object contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
